|
|
comments (3)
|
|
|
comments (1)
|
|
|
comments (0)
|
I thought that it was about time that I at least attempted to address this topic. An increase in paranormal study and fanaticism, seems to have lead to a consistant rise in this foreboding syndrome. Pareidolia is commonly described as "finding something in nothing". As an intellectually driven society we search for meaning in the mundane. This is also the same in certain aspects of the paranormal field. When viewing photographs for analysis or watching a live feed, our subconscious' search for faces to decipher; a hidden meaning in the open. This I feel is leading to a false perception of true paranormal research, as to the fact that anyone can claim to find a 'spirit' amongst a room of black. The strangest part to this escalating phenomena is that those who are posting these photographs for others to view, often sway people into seeing what they want them to see. An almost hearsay quality is adopted by these individuals (for lack of a better word). They either lack the motivation or intellectual aptitude to think for themselves and hence, they jump upon the band wagon. Now I know and respect the fact that everyone has their own opinions. Yet when you can see the face of the "Virgin Mary" on a piece of French Toast, I feel that a line needs to be drawn.
-FulCo
|
|
comments (2)
|
I had a thought that has been driving me mad the last few nights. Why is it that 'spirits' can apparently floating through walls yet are able to sit solid in a chair? Not barring the residual haunts, can a ghost have that sort of permeability and yet keep it's ethereal composition somewhat whole? It seems contradictory to me. The only comparison I can think of is that of a liquid(such as water). Water permeates through material by osmosis, but when frozen personifies solid form. I mean that could plausibly make sense, seeing as how as humans our bodies are composed of mainly water, you would think that this would carry over into the afterlife as well. If this is true, could it mean that if you were able to somehow freeze a 'spirit' it would take on a solid state, like that of ice? A little far fetched I know.... but hey anything is possible in this area of study.
-FulCoPara
|
|
comments (2)
|
I am the last person to say that they know anything. I feel that as a human society we have barely scratched the proverbial surface when it comes to what we understand about the world at large. With that said, it is in my opinion that there are two kinds of people that pursue this field of study. One being that of the paranormal investigator, the other the ghost hunter. I feel that an investigator is someone that quests for knowledge, someone that offers support to another who may be experiencing something without explanation. They do not seek monetary gain from other's confusion. These are the dedicated people who really are trying to make a difference. Whereas "ghost hunters" are in it for the cash and prizes so to speak. They seek the immortality and fame that is often associated with this type of study. These people charge for services, sometimes even for paranormal "classes". This concept befuddles me. How does one go about charging for information that isn't 100 percent viable or valid? They write books on the subject that have no clear answers and claim they are "helping" people by raking in $19.99 per copy. These thrillseekers should be ashamed of themselves. Not only do they belittle our possible advancement in this field, but take advantage of innocent people looking for answers.
-FulCo
|
|
comments (0)
|
The other night a friend and I were discussing the technology and techniques used by investigators in the paranormal field. We had discussed a few different postulations concerning new ideas for the topic at hand. The most plausible being this:
1. Make the Ethereal Spectrum visible.
2. Introduce a gaseous element to act as an amplifier.
3. Create a self-contained electro-magnetic field (possible using a small Tesla Coil).
4. Record and document the trials.
5. If possible, pull a vacuum on said field, in hopes of capturing phenomenon.
Now we readily debated which of the known gaseous elements would best be suited for said hypothesis. We came to the conclusion that Xenon, a Noble Gas would signify most of the properties we searching for. The most interesting is that when Xenon is in the presence of an electronic discharge, it produces a blue ambient glow. This characteristic is fascinating in the aspect that it could very well highlight or amplify the surrounding EMF. Its is therefore logical to assume that any phenomenon in the vicinity of said field, would also be highlighted and easily visible. Of course this will take time to setup and even longer for trials to run. If we are able to produce repeatable, consistent results we will publish the results online.
Problems and/or Contradictions:
Xenon being a Noble Gas is highly combustible and extremely dangerous. No one is suggested to try these experiments on their own.
-FulCo
|
|
comments (495)
|
I am curious as to what equipment other investigators are using on their cases.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE ITEMS WE ARE CURRENTLY USING:
This is a Digital Thermocouple K-Type Thermometer.
We use this rather than a Non-Contact Digital IR Thermometer because it measures variance in temperature from between the two K-Type Thermocouples, instead of surface temperature
Benefits:
General Specifications:
Electrical Specifications:
Accuracy:
This a Sony HandyCam 3.1 MegaPixels 20x-Optical Zoom 990x-Digital Zoom with NightShot Plus capabilities.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.
|
FulCoPara
|
|
comments (0)
|
I know that within my own group we have somewhat of a lengthy pre-screening process for potential clients. In my opinion there is no sense in taking on a case, that you can not handle, and let's face it sometimes an investigator no matter how good his/her intentions are, just aren't enough. Psychological guidance at times is required, something that no one except board licensed Psychotherapists or Parapsychologists should ever offer. With that said it is also important (at least in our group) to try and scan the client for a preliminary pre-disposition to or against believing in the paranormal. Do they read paranormal literature, watch documentaries, buy into hollywood's "based on a true story" mumbo-jumbo? Knowing what a person believes can dismiss or encourage case selection. It is also important to keep in mind the state that the client is in. Do they seem truly scared, inquisitive, alone, comical? Judgement is a key to determining not only which sites to pick but in studying this field as a whole. It is also important to understand that despite what a lot of us feel we may know, we know nothing at all. I would never guarantee a person anything, instead I might tell them that we would do our best to discover what we can. When you tell someone that you definitely can guarantee to do something, it makes them feel betrayed when you can not. It is always important to keep an open mind when listening to reports but not so open-minded that your brain falls out. Keep your wits about you and keep a somewhat skeptical and professional stance. Those are the basics of how we choose our cases, and I am interested in seeing how others perform theirs.
FulCoPara
|
|
comments (491)
|
|
|
comments (0)
|


